Research on Marketing and the Code
These studies explore issues around the marketing of infant formula and other issues which come under the umbrella of the International Code of Marketing of breastmilk substitutes. See our dedicated resource page for more information on the Code and further reading.
Danone Nutricia: Why do they want to be your partner?
This evidence-based report published in January 2020 helps NGOs, charities, health professionals and advocacy groups to better understand why breastmilk substitute companies attempt to partner with organisations working with pregnant women, infants and children and how these partnerships can negatively affect care for mothers and babies
Based on science? Revisiting Nestlé’s infant milk products and claims, 2019
This report investigates Nestlé, as the world market leader for infant milk products for babies under 12 months old. It revisits findings from previous reports (Busting the myth of science-based formula, 2018 & Milking it: How Milk Formula Companies are Putting Profits Before Science, 2017 – see write up below). The current report finds that, despite Nestlé committing to making three changes to its global infant formula ranges (removing sucrose and vanilla compounds from all its products for babies aged under 12 months, and removing contradictory nutritional advice on sucrose and vanilla flavourings), it has so far failed to fulfil two out of these three commitments, with only the promise to remove sucrose being fulfilled at the time of publication of the report.
Researchers also found that Nestlé continues to draw comparisons between its products and human milk (a practice coming under the scope of the Code); and practises price premiumisation between different countries and markets. For more detail, see our news post on the report.
Infant formula advertising in medical journals: a cross-sectional study (and struggle to publish)
Researchers in this study hand-searched high-impact paediatric and general medical journals published between 2003 and 2012 to quantify the prevalence of breastmilk substitute (BMS) advertising. Although uncommon overall, in this study period BMS advertising was carried by leading clinical journals and, in particular, two leading child health journals, Archives of Diseases in Childhood (ADC) and ADC Fetal and Neonatal edition. Adverts also appeared in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), which had the highest print circulation in the UK (BMJ Group, 2013). The authors recommend that journals do not carry BMS adverts, arguing that there are many other opportunities for health professionals in the UK to access independent and comparative information about BMS products. Interestingly, the authors struggled to publish their findings, with the paper initially being rejected by two journals carrying the most advertisements.
Morgan, S, Waterston, T, and Kerac, M (2018). Infant formula advertising in medical journals: a cross-sectional study (and struggle to publish). Field Exchange. https://www.ennonline.net/fex/58/infantformulaadvertising
Marketing of breast-milk substitutes: national implementation of the international code, status report 2018
WHO, IBFAN and UNICEF’s joint report, Marketing of breast-milk substitutes: national implementation of the international code, status report 2018 looks at the extent to which countries have incorporated the Code into their national laws. Although some countries have made progress since the last status report in 2016, the authors highlight that too few countries have robust measures in place to tackle inappropriate marketing of breastmilk substitutes.
Don’t push it: Why the formula industry must clean up its act
Save the Children’s cross-sector report highlights how misleading and inaccurate marketing of breastmilk substitutes is putting babies’ lives at risk by undermining breastfeeding and preventing families from receiving clear, evidence based information about infant feeding.
Breaking the rules, Stretching the rules 2017
IBFAN-ICDC’s 11th global monitoring report is a compilation of marketing practices from around the world that violate the International Code over the past 3 years. Collected from IBFAN’s regional and country groups and volunteers, it contains almost 800 legally-vetted entries on 28 companies from 79 countries.
Milking it: How Milk Formula Companies are Putting Profits Before Science
This report from the Changing Markets Foundation investigates the products of four formula milk companies across 14 global markets. It finds wide disparities in price across different markets, and concludes that increasing product differentiation is not science-based, but instead informed by careful research into consumer preferences, guided by a desire to increase profits. https://changingmarkets.org/portfolio/milking-it/ (October 2017)
Long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LCPUFA) supplementation in infants born at term
Some formula milk companies have begun supplementing their products with LPCUFA; this review explored the marketing claim that such supplementation supports term infants’ development. The authors found that full-term babies fed formula milk supplemented with LCPUFA did not have better outcomes than were reported for full-term babies fed formula milk without LCPUFA.
New Review of Breastmilk Substitutes Advertising Launched
First Steps Nutrition Trust has published “‘Scientific and factual?’ A review of breastmilk substitutes advertising to healthcare professionals.” The document examines the evidence given to support advertising claims about formula milk, revealing a worryingly common use of misleading and unscientific information contrary to international, EU and national regulations over formula milk advertising.
The review points out that there is “no mechanism to challenge whether adverts are in fact ‘scientific and factual’ in their content and presentation. Manufacturers of breastmilk substitutes advertise their products to healthcare professionals in magazines, through company representatives’ information, healthcare professional websites, at study days and via helplines. Many of the claims made by manufacturersare, however, not accepted by scientific bodies, the evidence may be weak or non-existent and it may relate to a product other than that being advertised. We believe that this misleads healthcare professionals.”
This is an insightful and essential read for any health professional working on infant feeding, demonstrating the need fto be extremely vigilant before accepting any claims.
The impact of marketing of breast-milk substitutes on WHO-recommended breastfeeding practices
This study describes sales and marketing of breast-milk substitutes and their influence on World Health Organization-recommended breastfeeding behaviours, focusing on low- and middle-income countries.
Global sales of breast-milk substitutes reached US$40 billion in 2013. Growth in sales exceeds 10% annually in many low- and middle-income countries, while it is close to stagnant in high-income countries. Breast-milk substitutes are marketed directly to consumers via mass media and print advertisements and indirectly via incentives, free supplies, and promotions to and through health workers and facilities, retailers, and policy makers. Internet marketing via company web sites and social media is on the rise. Marketing influences social norms by making formula use seem to be extensive, modern, and comparable to or better than breast milk. Clear evidence of a negative impact is found when breast-milk substitutes are provided for free in maternity facilities and when they are promoted by health workers and in the media. Influences through other channels are plausible, but rigorous studies are lacking. Marketing remains widespread even in countries that have adopted the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes to restrict such activities.
The authors conclude that adopting stricter regulatory frameworks coupled with independent, quantitative monitoring and compliance enforcement are needed to counter the impacts of formula marketing globally.
Enforcing the code for better promotion of exclusive breastfeeding
This study explored the implementation challenges regarding the Code.
The authors recommend establishing national breastfeeding committees with authority to improve regulations, investigate violations, and enforce the laws. They stress that managers of multinational companies must be held accountable for international violations, and international legislative enforcement needs to be established.
Barennes, H., Slesak, G., Goyet, S., Aaron, P., Srour, LM. (2015) Enforcing the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes for Better Promotion of Exclusive Breastfeeding: Can Lessons Be Learned? Journal of Human Lactation, doi:10.1177/0890334415607816
Advertisements of follow-on formula and their perception by pregnant women and mothers in Italy
Findings highlighted in this study:
- Qualitative study, interviewing mothers about magazine advertisements for follow-on formula
- Ambiguity of advertisements meant that the follow-on formula was confused with infant (first) formula
- A majority of women thought that the products advertised were to be used from birth
Unicef UK Baby Friendly Initiative Supports Call for Adherence to International Code of Marketing Breastmilk Substitutes
9 April 2013
Unicef UK Baby Friendly Initiative today urged supporters to join the call for formula milk companies to change their marketing techniques, as outlined in the recent Save the Children report ‘Superfood for Babies’.
Since the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (the Code) was adopted by the World Health Assembly in 1981, Unicef has worked with national governments to make the Code part of national law, and to date more than 100 countries have done so, at least in part. Unicef has also promoted the adoption of the principles of the Code in health-care facilities across the world through the Baby Friendly Initiative.
Despite the Code now being over 30 years old, aggressive marketing practices from the formula milk industry continue to be reported (as highlighted by the recent Save the Children report and ongoing work of groups such as IBFAN). Such practices can influence a mother’s decision not to breastfeed, with the subsequent impact on child health.
Unicef UK’s Guide for health workers to working within the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes provides health professionals with guidance on all the forms of professional interactions with the formula milk industry from using their materials to attendance at study days to accepting accepting money in the form of grants or research funding.
The importance of breastfeeding in tackling malnutrition in developing countries was underscored in the UNICEF UK report The right ingredients: the need to invest in child nutrition, launched on Mother’s Day, which highlights the potential of exclusive breastfeeding to dramatically reduce child deaths. To find out more about the report, click here.
New Report Calls for Global Action to Support Breastfeeding
18 February 2013
Save The Children has today launched a new report calling for more support for breastfeeding and action to prevent formula companies using damaging marketing practices.
The report, Superfood for Babies, estimates more than 800,000 deaths could be prevented each year if babies were given breastmilk in the first hour of life. It highlights four major barriers to breastfeeding:
Community and cultural pressures: In many cases a mother may not be free to make her own choice about how she feeds her baby. Education and awareness of the benefits of breastfeeding are instrumental in helping to change views.
The health worker shortage: Currently, one third of babies are born without a skilled attendant present at birth. Resources are needed to improve this.
Lack of maternity legislation: Maternity leave, pay and workplace provision for breastfeeding are all key factors needed to support mothers to continue to breastfeed.
The big business barrier: Formula milk companies use marketing practices and target healthcare workers in ways that threaten lives and violate the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. These practices can lead to infant formula being used unnecessarily and improperly, ultimately putting children at risk. Changes in company policy and stronger legislation are required to restrict these activities.
The report calls for action on all these issues, and particularly calls on the UK to use its presidency of the G8 this year to secure funding for breastfeeding programmes as part of plans to tackle malnutrition.
Circumventing the WHO Code? An Observational Study
This study compares the formula milk advertisements appearing in parenting magazines in four countries – the USA and Canada where there are no restrictions on formula advertising, the UK where formula milk advertising is prohibited but advertising for follow-on formula is not and Australia where both formula milk and follow-on formula milk advertising is prohibited.
The authors found that promotion of formula products or brands occurred in all the magazines, however the type of product advertised differed. Follow-on formula advertisements occurred most frequently in the UK and toddler milk advertisements in Australia.
The authors conclude that bans on the advertising of some infant formula products do not reduce the advertising of infant formula per se, and that products such as follow-on formula are presented in ways that encourage consumers to associate the claims made in them with a group of products (a product line) that includes infant formula, reducing the effectiveness of any advertising restrictions.
Unicef UK comment – This study demonstrates that comprehensive and complete legislation is required to implement the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes if such legislation is to be effective.
Related research and further reading
The Lancet: Increasing breastfeeding worldwide could prevent over 800,000 child deaths every year